Featured Post

Wake-up Call to Muslims , Scholars & Humanity ! جاگو جاگو جاگو امت مسلمہ

Presently the societies are in a state of ideological confusion and flux. Materialism, terrorism, ignorance and intolera...


Ghazwa e Hind - Holy war for India

There are Ahadith which are being used by extremist groups propagating a war against India. All these ahadith refer to troops going from Palestine and Syria and returning to those regions. Even if these ahadith were authentic, and they are indeed found in reliable books, even though I haven't investigated the respective authenticity of them, they have nothing to do with any possibility of an Indo-Pak war.

The other important thing to note is that Abu Huraira, the companion-narrator is suggesting that it was something that was about to happen during his lifetime. It is quite likely that Muhammad Bin Qasim's conquest of Sind was being prophesied in these ahadith. There used to be kings in India then; there aren't any kings there anymore.

The third important matter to note is that a message as important as the one mentioned in these narratives is described in all different versions of it through only one companion. Clearly, if the message was important, there should have been several narrators mentioning it.

This message therefore cannot be employed as an excuse to fight against India. We can fight against India or any other nation only if conditions of Jihad are satisfied, which are: it should be declared by a Muslim ruler, Muslims should be at least half as militarily strong as their enemies, and the enemy should be guilty of blatant injustice against a group of people. Any individual or group of people cannot declare Jihad privately on their own against anyone; if they do, they will be guilty of creating fasaad fil 'ard (mischief on earth). 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Ethics, Science, Spirituality & Peace
Peace Forum Network
Over 1,000,000 Visits
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Imam Mehdi: Not mentioned in Quran - Analysis

Mehdi's Arrival: Is it an essential belief?  Will he be an Imam?

The first thing be clear is that the arrival of 'Imam Mehdi' is a piece of information, which has been given to us through some compilations of hadith, claimed to have been shared with a select few by Prophet Muhammad (sws). This does not constitute belief, for belief essentially means the Qur'an: the Message that was transmitted to all people around Prophet Muhammad (sws) as the binding word of God, forming a necessary part of our understanding of Islam - rejecting any part of which would place us outside the fold of Islam.

Informations contained in ahadith, which can be debated over by scholars as to their authenticity and reliability, do not and cannot form a part of our belief system. Belief entails absolute certainty, and does not presume doubts about what is acceptable and what isn't.

I will, therefore, comment on 'Imam Mehdi' and the proposed arrival as religious information, and not as a component of belief; even more so because there is not a single mention of the arrival of an 'Imam Mehdi' in the Qur'an. I believe that the Qur'an being the fully preserved, last book from the Almighty, would've ensured a reference to such an incident, if at all Muslims needed to be guided about such a future event.

From an academic point of view too, 'Imam Mehdi' has not even been mentioned in any of the authentic, sahih ahadith. There is a very strong argument that all ahadith that do mention such a coming, do not pass as 'sahih' (not befitting the criteria of reliability, as set by the doctors of hadith) in the first place.

The arrival of 'Imam Mehdi', seems to me, to come from the Shia school of thought, amongst the Muslims. The Shia mainly differs with the Sunni, in that he believes that the God Almighty Himself appointed twelve Imams after Prophet Muhammad (sws), in order that they may guide Muslims in worldly and spiritual matters. The first of these Imams is believed to be Ali (ra), then his sons, Hassan and Hussain (ra), followed by the progeny of Ali and Fatima (ra). The twelfth Imam in this chain is supposed to have disappeared, following which, contact was established with him, indicating that, he re-appeared in a sense. He is believed to have disappeared again, inspiring a wait for his second re-appearance. This second period of his disappearance has continued till now. It is believed by the Shias that the day he returns will be the day marking the revival of the Muslim Ummah, returning to it, its lost glory. This is briefly how the Shia Muslim understands the coming/return of 'Imam Mehdi'.

The Sunni Muslim does not believe in the twelver Imamate of the Shias. They believe that Mehdi will be an Imam in his own right, and would be an Imam in the sense of a leader - one who will lead the Ummah against the enemies of Islam, and succeed in this endeavour, once again, towards the same end - that is, glory of the Muslims.

The problem with either understanding is that it promotes slackness and lack of incentive to act and make a difference, especially in times of subjugation by the powers that be. As a result, one fails to accept the blame for the woes of the Ummah, a decline, if there is, is attributed to fate as opposed to our own unwillingness to progress. This is a highly unacceptable and ineffective way of approaching our problems. Indeed, according to the Qur'an and Ahadith, this worldly life is a trial, and if we do not strive to act as per the teachings of Islam, we will suffer in this world - the Ummah will keep getting weaker, falling deeper into its subjugation by non-Muslims.

Awaiting 'Imam Mehdi' essentially means that our focus shifts away from searching within ourselves for reasons of our degeneration, towards pinning hopes on an individual to miraculously come to our rescue. The moment one stops self-evaluation is the moment one stops recognising problems and looking for solutions. The sense of urgency to reform and to improve is sourly missing. Unfortunately, that seems to be an established pattern with the Ummah today, only helping aggravate our situation. What else can one expect, when refuge is sought in the coming of one individual, as opposed to the Qur'an!

To summarize:

i) The idea of an 'Imam Mehdi' is itself just religious information, at best, and not belief, having no bases in the Qur'an;
ii) The information itself comes from reports rejected by the doctors of hadith as unauthentic;
iii) As a result of pinning our hopes on the coming of an 'Imam', the condition of the Ummah is constantly in decline, and despite, Muslims seem unwilling to act.
By Dr.Khalid Zaheer: http://www.khalidzaheer.com/qa/318
Mehdi means "guided one" many people claimed to be Mehdi which later proved to be false. This is being used by terrorists and militants to justify their heinous crimes against humanity. So be WARNED !!!!
More Videos >>>>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Ethics, Science, Spirituality & Peace
Peace Forum Network
Over 1,000,000 Visits
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *